[Event "Oakham Young Masters 1984"]  [White "Pia Cramling"]  [Black "Joseph Gallagher"]  [Result "0-1"]  [ECO "B93"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "52"]  [EventDate "1984.04.??"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "9"]  [EventCountry "ENG"]  [SourceTitle "Unknown"]  [SourceDate "2009.03.03"]  [SourceVersionDate "2009.03.03"]   1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. f4 e5 7. Nf3 Nbd7 8. a4  Be7 9. Bd3 O-O 10. O-O Qc7 11. Nh4 (11. Kh1 {is the most common move here, e.g.  ,} Re8 (11... exf4 12. Bxf4 Ne5 13. Nxe5 dxe5 14. Bg5 Be6 15. Bxf6 Bxf6 16.  Rxf6 gxf6 17. Nd5 Bxd5 18. exd5 Rfd8 19. Qh5 Kf8 20. Rf1 Ke7 $17 {is ECO's  erroneous evaluation based on} 21. c4 a5 $1 {So says ECO but in reality it  should be ?!} (21... Qb6 $11) 22. Qh4 (22. b3 $14) 22... Rd6 23. Rf5 Rb6 $17 {  G. Garcia-A. Petrosian, Tunja 1987, Informant 44/(306); Stockfish rates the  position as equal}) (11... Nc5 12. Qe1 (12. Bd2 $11 {is better according to  Stockfish}) 12... Re8 13. fxe5 dxe5 14. Qg3 Bd8 $11) 12. Nh4 exf4 (12... d5 $11  {according to Stockfish is strangely not in the database}) 13. Nf5 $1 {  According to Stockfish, a few hundreths of a pawn better than the more usual} (  13. Bxf4) 13... Nc5 14. Rxf4 Bxf5 15. Rxf5 Qc6 $11 {Khalifman-Shneider, Lvov  1985}) 11... g6 $2 (11... Nc5 12. Qe2 Bg4 $15) 12. f5 $16 d5 13. exd5 Nxd5 $6 (  13... e4 14. Be2 Bd6 15. g3 b6 16. Be3 ({Better is} 16. Ng2 $16 {with the plan  (according to Nunn) of Bh6 and Ne3 supporting the pawns on d5 and f5}) 16...  Bb7 17. Qd2 $16 {but a draw was agreed to here in Sax-Andersson, London 1980})  14. Nxd5 Qc5+ 15. Be3 Qxd5 16. fxg6 hxg6 $2 (16... fxg6 17. Qg4 Rxf1+ 18. Rxf1  Nf8 19. Nf5 $1 Bxf5 20. Rxf5 $16) 17. Nxg6 $4 {Can you spell U-N-S-O-U-N-D?} (  17. Qg4 $1 {wins in all lines, e.g.,} Qe6 {best, according to Stockfish} (17...  Nb6 18. Qg3 {and the twin threats against b6 and g6 can't be parried}) (17...  Nf6 18. Nxg6 $1 Bxg4 19. Nxe7+ Kg7 20. Bh6+ $1 Kxh6 21. Rxf6+ Kg7 22. Nxd5 Rad8  23. Ne3 Kxf6 24. Nxg4+ $18) (17... Bxh4 18. Bxg6 $18) 18. Nf5 Nc5 19. Nh6+ Kh8  20. Bf5 $1 $18) 17... fxg6 18. Qg4 Rxf1+ 19. Rxf1 Nf8 20. Qg3 $2 (20. Bc4 Bxg4  21. Bxd5+ Kh8 22. Bxb7 Rb8 23. Bxa6 Rxb2 $17) 20... Bc5 $6 (20... e4 $1 $19)  21. Bxc5 Qxc5+ 22. Kh1 Kg7 23. Qg5 $2 (23. b3 $1 Be6 24. Qg5 Qc7 25. h4 Bd5 26.  h5 Qd6 27. h6+ Kh7 $17) 23... Qd6 $19 24. h4 Nh7 25. Qg3 Bd7 26. Re1 Rh8 0-1  

  [Event "Paul Keres Memorial 1991"]  [Site "Vancouver, BC"]  [White "Lubomir Ftacnik"]  [Black "Zvonko Vranesic"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "D37"]  [WhiteElo "2590"]  [BlackElo "2401"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "78"]  [EventDate "1991.05.??"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "6"]  [EventCountry "CAN"]  [SourceTitle "Canbase"]  [SourceDate "2015.08.19"]  [SourceVersion "1"]  [SourceVersionDate "2015.08.19"]  [SourceQuality "1"]   1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 d5 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 Be7 5. Bf4 O-O 6. e3 Nbd7 ({The immediate}  6... c5 {is more common}) 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8. Bg3 ({The main line here is} 8. Nxd5)  8... Nxc3 (8... c5 9. Bd3 cxd4 10. exd4 N7f6 11. Ne5 Nb4 $11 {Macieja-Nakar,  Dallas 2017}) 9. bxc3 c5 10. Bd3 cxd4 (10... b6 11. Be4 $6 (11. O-O $11) 11...  Ba6 12. Bxa8 $6 (12. Bd3 $11) 12... Qxa8 $15) 11. exd4 $5 (11. cxd4 Qa5+ 12.  Nd2 Nb6 $11) 11... h6 $6 (11... b6 12. O-O (12. Be4 Ba6 13. Bxa8 $2 (13. Qa4  $11) 13... Qxa8 $17) 12... Bb7 $11 {Colin-Koziak, Sautron 2015}) 12. O-O Qa5 ({  Better is} 12... Nf6 13. Ne5 $14) 13. Qb3 (13. Ne5 $1 $16) 13... Nf6 14. Rfe1 (  14. a4 $1 $14) 14... Bd7 15. c4 (15. Ne5 $14) 15... b6 $6 (15... Rac8 $14) 16.  a4 Rac8 17. Bf4 $1 Qb4 18. Qa2 (18. Qc2 $1 Nd5 19. Bd2 Qd6 20. Ne5 $16) 18...  Rfd8 19. a5 (19. Ne5 $14) 19... Bc6 $11 20. axb6 Bxf3 21. gxf3 axb6 22. Be5 Ra8  (22... Nd7 $1 $11) 23. Qe2 Rxa1 (23... Bd6 $1 $11) 24. Rxa1 Nd7 $6 (24... Bd6  $1 $11) 25. Bc7 $14 Rc8 ({Better is} 25... Rf8) 26. Qe4 Nf6 $6 (26... g6 27.  Bf4 $14) 27. Qb7 $16 Re8 28. Qxb6 Qd2 29. Bf1 $2 (29. Qb3 $1 $16) 29... Nd7 30.  Qb3 (30. Qa7 Bf6 $11) 30... Qxd4 $11 31. Rd1 Nc5 32. Rxd4 (32. Qb5 $5 Qxd1 33.  Qxe8+ Bf8 34. Kg2 $11) 32... Nxb3 33. Rd7 Nc1 (33... Kf8 $11) 34. Bb6 Nb3 35.  Rc7 (35. Be3 $11) 35... Kf8 36. c5 Rb8 $4 (36... Bd8 37. Rb7 Na5 38. Ra7 Nc6  39. Rd7 Bf6 $11) 37. c6 $18 Bc5 (37... Rxb6 38. Rc8+ Bd8 39. c7) 38. Rb7 Rc8  39. c7 Bxb6 1-0   

  [Event "Manchester, NH"]  [Site "Queen City Open 2005"]  [White "Josh Friedel"]  [Black "Braden Bournival"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "B14"]  [WhiteElo "2477"]  [BlackElo "2280"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "51"]  [EventDate "2005.02.??"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "4"]  [EventCountry "ENG"]  [SourceTitle "CH April-June 2005"]  [SourceDate "2006.10.08"]  [SourceVersionDate "2006.10.08"]   1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. c4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e6 6. Nf3 Bb4 7. cxd5 Nxd5 8.  Qc2 ({Another possibility is} 8. Bd2 {e.g.,} Nc6 9. Bd3 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. a3  Bf6 12. Qc2 h6 13. Rad1 Nxd4 14. Nxd4 Bxd4 15. Nxd5 Qxd5 16. Be3 e5 $11 {  Shchekachev-Rausis, France 2000}) 8... Nc6 ({Or} 8... O-O 9. Bd3 h6 10. O-O Nc6  11. a3 Bd6 $11) 9. Be2 (9. Bc4 Nb6 10. Bb5 O-O 11. Bxc6 bxc6 12. O-O c5 $11)  9... O-O 10. O-O Re8 (10... h6 11. Rd1 Nce7 (11... Ba5 $5) 12. Ne5 Qc7 13. Bd2  Bd6 14. Qe4 {Akesson-Hillarp Persson, Stockholm 2000} Nf6 $11) (10... Be7 11.  Rd1 Ncb4 (11... Bf6 {The old main line here} 12. Qe4 Nce7 13. Bd3 g6 14. Bh6  Re8 15. h4 Bd7 $11 {Adams-Magem Badals, Debrecen 1992}) 12. Qb3 b6 13. a3 Nxc3  14. bxc3 Nc6 15. c4 Na5 {I. Gurevich-Seirawan, San Francisco 1999} (15... Ba6  $1) 16. Qc2 $11) (10... Nce7 11. Bd3 (11. Bd2) (11. Nxd5) 11... h6 12. a3 Bd6  13. Qe2 Bd7 14. Nxd5 exd5 $11 {Marin-Holmsgaard, Andorra 2004}) 11. Rd1 (11.  Bc4 $5) 11... Bf8 (11... Bd6 $11) 12. Ne5 (12. Bg5 Qa5 $6 (12... Be7 $11) 13.  Ne4 $6 (13. Bd3 $14) 13... Bd7 14. a3 $11 {Wolff-Speelman, New York 1990})  12... Nxe5 $6 $146 (12... Nxc3 13. Qxc3 Bd7 14. Bf3 (14. Qf3 Nxe5 15. dxe5 Qc7  $11) 14... Rc8 15. Qb3 Nxe5 16. dxe5 b6 $11 {Sveshnikov-Tukmakov, Budapest 1996  }) 13. dxe5 Qc7 {What do you do when you've just blundered against a much  higher rated opponent? If your sense of etiquette is such that you have no  problem annoying people by bombarding them with spam,* you annoy your opponent  by offering a draw.} 14. Bd3 Qxe5 $6 (14... h6 15. Nxd5 Qxc2 16. Nf6+ gxf6 17.  Bxc2 fxe5 18. Ba4 $14) 15. Bxh7+ Kh8 16. Qa4 (16. Be4 {is a bit stronger})  16... Nxc3 (16... Bd7 $1 17. Qh4 (17. Qxd7 Nxc3 18. bxc3 Red8 19. Bf4 $1 (19.  Qxd8 $4 Rxd8 20. Rxd8 $4 Qe1#) 19... Qxf4 20. Qxd8 Rxd8 21. Rxd8 Kxh7 22. Rxf8  $11) 17... Be7 18. Qh3 Nf6 19. Be4+ Kg8 20. Bxb7 $14) 17. bxc3 Rd8 18. Bf4  Rxd1+ 19. Rxd1 Bd7 20. Qe4 Qb5 $2 (20... Qxe4 21. Bxe4 Bb5 22. Bxb7 $16) 21.  Be5 $18 Be7 (21... Qa4 {would prolong the game a bit, e.g.,} 22. Rd4 Qa3 23.  Qb1 Bc6 24. Rh4 {etc.}) 22. c4 $1 Qa4 (22... Qc5 {loses a piece but saves the  king (for the time being)}) 23. Qg4 Bf6 24. Qh5 Qa5 {Black decides to put a  quick end to his suffering by stepping into a checkmate} 25. Bg6+ Kg8 26. Qh7+  1-0  

  [Event "Leeds 1990"]  [White "John Nunn"]  [Black "Glenn Flear"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "C80"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "55"]  [EventDate "1990.??.??"]  [SourceTitle "StarBase 4.56"]  [SourceDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceVersion "1"]  [SourceVersionDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceQuality "2"]   1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Nxe4 6. d4 b5 7. Bb3 d5 8. dxe5  Be6 9. Nbd2 Nc5 10. c3 d4 11. Bxe6 ({Karpov introduced the amazing piece sac}  11. Ng5 {against Korchnoi in 1978 but it's been analyzed out} Qxg5 ({Korchnoi  declined with} 11... dxc3 12. Nxe6 fxe6 13. bxc3 Qd3 {and was lucky to escape  with a draw. Interestingly, in the 1989 Batsford Chess Openings II, Kasparov  gave} 14. Bc2 $6 Qxc3 15. Rb1 O-O-O $15 {but in his 1995 match against Anand,  14. Bc2 got an exclam (in his Informant notes) and he uncorked 15. Nb3!!}) 12.  Qf3 O-O-O 13. Bxe6+ fxe6 14. Qxc6 Qxe5 15. b4 Qd5 $1 16. Qxd5 exd5 17. bxc5  dxc3 18. Nb3 d4 19. Ba3 $11) 11... Nxe6 12. cxd4 Ncxd4 13. a4 (13. Ne4 {  is the old main line, e.g.,} Be7 (13... Qd5 $5) 14. Be3 Nf5 15. Qc2 O-O 16.  Neg5 $11 {Karpov-Korchnoi, 16th match game, 1981}) 13... Rb8 ({Stockfish gives  } 13... Nc6 {as best, e.g.,} 14. Qe2 Be7 15. Qe4 Nb4 16. axb5 O-O 17. bxa6 Rxa6  18. Rxa6 Nxa6 19. Nc4 $14) (13... Bc5 14. Ne4 Bb6 15. Nfg5 Qd5 {has been  played many times but Stockfish's} 16. a5 $1 $14 {does not appear to be in the  database}) (13... Be7 14. Nxd4 Nxd4 15. Ne4 Ne6 16. Be3 O-O 17. f4 $16 {  gave Karpov a crushing win and the world championship in the 18th and final  game of his 1981 match against Korchnoi}) 14. axb5 axb5 15. Nxd4 (15. Ne4 $1  $14) 15... Nxd4 $2 (15... Qxd4 $11) 16. Ne4 ({Even stronger, according to  Stockfish, is} 16. Nb3 Nxb3 17. Qxb3 Qc8 18. Rd1 Qe6 19. Qxe6+ fxe6 20. Ra6 $16  ) 16... Be7 $6 (16... Qd5) 17. Be3 Nc6 $2 (17... Ne6 18. f4 $16) 18. Qg4 $18 g6  $2 (18... Qd5 19. Ra6 $18 (19. Qxg7 Qxe5 $16)) 19. Bh6 Nxe5 20. Qf4 Nd3 (20...  f6 {is a whole pawn equivalent better but what's the difference between being  up the equivalent of six pawns and being up the equivalent of seven pawns?})  21. Qe3 f5 22. Rad1 ({Again, not that it matters but} 22. Rfd1 {is a whole  pawn equivalent better}) 22... fxe4 23. Qxe4 Kd7 {In an apparent attempt to  end his misery quickly, the Black king walks the plank rather than endure} (  23... Rb6 24. Rxd3 Rd6 25. Rfd1 {etc.}) 24. Rxd3+ Bd6 25. Qg4+ (25. Rxd6+ {  leads to mate in 12 (don't you hate computers?)}) 25... Kc6 26. Rc1+ Kb7 27.  Qe4+ Kc8 28. Qe6+ 1-0  

  [Event "Columbus, Ohio"]   [Date "1988"]  [Round "?"]  [White "Sergey Kudrin"]  [Black "Benjamin Finegold"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "C06"]  [WhiteElo "2545"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "49"]  [EventDate "1988.??.??"]  [SourceTitle "StarBase 4.56"]  [SourceDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceVersion "1"]  [SourceVersionDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceQuality "2"]   1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nd2 Nf6 (3... c5 {is, of course, the main alternative with  }) (3... Nc6 {being an alternative although Stockfish says that}) (3... Be7 {  is best}) 4. e5 Nfd7 5. Bd3 c5 6. c3 Nc6 7. Ne2 Qb6 (7... cxd4 8. cxd4 f6 9.  exf6 (9. Nf4) 9... Nxf6 10. Nf3 Bd6 11. O-O O-O 12. Bf4 {is probably the main  line.}) 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. cxd4 f6 (9... Bb4+ 10. Kf1 Be7 (10... O-O $2 11. Bxh7+)  11. g3 $14 {A. Sznapik-Minev, Eksjö 1980}) 10. exf6 Nxf6 11. O-O Bd6 12. Nc3 (  12. Re1 O-O 13. Nc3 Bd7 14. Bg5 (14. h3 $14 {Stockfish}) 14... Ng4 $6 (14... h6  $11 {Stockfish}) 15. Bh4 Nh6 $6 (15... g6 {or}) (15... Qxb2) 16. Bg3 $14 {  Van der Wiel-Short, Biel 1985}) 12... O-O 13. Bg5 (13. Be3 Bd7 14. Rc1 (14. Ne5  Bxe5 15. dxe5 Qxb2 16. exf6 Qxc3 17. fxg7 Qxg7 $11) 14... Qd8 15. Qe2 $14) (13.  h3 Bd7 14. Re1 $14 {Proehl-Holzke, Germany 1999}) 13... a6 $6 (13... Bd7 $11) (  13... h6 $11) 14. a3 (14. Rc1 $1 Qxb2 15. Na4 Qa3 16. Nb6 $16) 14... Kh8 (14...  Bd7 $11) 15. Bc2 Qc7 16. Qd3 Qf7 $6 (16... g6 $14) 17. Bh4 Qh5 ({Again} 17...  g6 $14 {according to Stockfish}) 18. Bg3 Bxg3 $6 ({Stockfish gives the inhuman  (but very computer-like) move} 18... Bb8 {as best, e.g.:} 19. Na4 Ba7 20. Bd6  Bd7 21. Nc5 $16 (21. Bxf8 {isn't quite as good})) ({Stockfish also prefers the  move human} 18... e5 {to the text, e.g.} 19. dxe5 Bxe5 20. Nxe5 Nxe5 21. Qd1  $16) 19. fxg3 (19. hxg3 $2 Ng4 $19) 19... Bd7 20. h3 Qh6 21. g4 g5 $6 (21...  Ng8 22. g5 Qh5 23. Rae1 $16) 22. Nxg5 $1 $18 {Overloading the defenders of h7}  Nxd4 (22... Qxg5 23. Rxf6) 23. Nxh7 $1 Nxc2 (23... Nxh7 24. Qxd4+ $18) 24. Nxf8  Nxa1 25. Rxf6 $1 1-0   

  [Event "New York 1950"]  [White "Reuben Fine"]  [Black "Arnold Denker"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "B43"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "61"]  [EventDate "1950.??.??"]  [SourceTitle "StarBase 4.56"]  [SourceDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceVersion "1"]  [SourceVersionDate "2004.11.04"]  [SourceQuality "2"]   1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. g3 {Avoiding the main  lines of the Najdorf before the Najdorf had main lines} b5 7. Bg2 Bb7 8. O-O e6  {transposing to the Taimanov Variation} 9. a3 Qc7 10. g4 (10. f4 {appears to  have been the main line as in, e.g., Czerniak-Kotov, Venice 1950 where after}  Be7 11. g4 Nc6 12. Be3 $2 (12. Nxc6) 12... h5 $1 {White self-destructed with  an unsound piece sacrifice on b5.}) 10... Nc6 (10... h6) 11. g5 Nd7 (11... Nxd4  12. Qxd4 (12. gxf6 $6 Nc6 13. fxg7 Bxg7 $15) 12... Ng4 (12... Nd7 13. a4 b4 14.  Qxb4 d5 15. Qd4 $14) 13. h3 Ne5 14. f4 Nc4 $11) 12. Nde2 g6 (12... Be7 $11) 13.  Be3 $6 (13. Qd3 $1 Nce5 14. Qg3 Bg7 $11) 13... Bg7 (13... h6 $1 14. gxh6 Bxh6  $15) 14. Qd2 Nde5 15. b3 O-O $11 16. Rad1 Rfd8 17. h3 b4 $2 (17... Rac8 $11)  18. axb4 d5 $6 (18... Nd7 $16) 19. exd5 Nxb4 20. d6 $1 $18 {Did Black perhaps  miss this move?} Qc8 21. Ne4 {Or this move?} Nd5 $6 (21... Bxe4 22. Bxe4 Rb8 {  offers stiffer resistance}) 22. Bd4 Nd7 (22... f5 23. Nc5 Rxd6 24. c4 $18) 23.  c4 (23. Bxg7 Kxg7 24. c4 {is even stronger since Black then doesn't have} e5 {  hitting the bishop}) 23... e5 24. Ba1 f5 25. cxd5 fxe4 26. Ng3 Nc5 27. Qe3 Nd3  28. Qxe4 Nf4 29. Rc1 Qb8 {I can't call this a blunder even though Stockfish rates 29... Nxh3+ as five pawns better} 30. Rc7 Re8 31. Rxg7+ $1 1-0   

  [Event "Harvard Open 1991"]  [White "GM Pat Wolff"]  [Black "IM Joe Fang"]  [Result "0-1"]  [ECO "C88"]  [WhiteElo "2585"]  [BlackElo "2414"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "68"]  [EventDate "1991.05.??"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "4"]  [EventCountry "USA"]  [SourceTitle "CH, July-Aug 1991"]   1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. O-O Be7 6. Re1 b5 7. Bb3 O-O 8. a4  Rb8 $5 (8... b4 {and}) (8... Bb7 {are the main lines}) 9. axb5 axb5 10. c3 b4 (  {Three years later, at the 1994 New York Open, Fang played} 10... d5 {  (slightly better according to Stockfish) against Wolff and lost in 35 moves  (Inf 61/342)}) 11. d4 bxc3 12. d5 (12. bxc3 exd4 13. e5 Ne8 14. cxd4 $14 {  Dvoirys-Jumabayev, Pavlodar Open 2010 (drawn in 62 moves)}) 12... Nd4 (12...  cxb2 13. Bxb2 Bb4 14. dxc6 Bxe1 15. Nxe1 Nxe4 16. Bxe5 Qe7 17. Nf3 $14) 13.  Nxd4 exd4 (13... cxb2 $1 14. Bxb2 exd4 15. Bxd4 Bb4 16. Re2 $14) 14. bxc3 dxc3  15. Nxc3 $2 (15. e5 $1 $16) 15... Bb4 $11 16. Bd2 d6 17. Ba4 $2 (17. f3 $11)  17... Ng4 18. h3 Nxf2 $2 (18... Ne5 $17) 19. Kxf2 Qf6+ (19... Bc5+ {is better,  e.g.} 20. Kg3 Bd4 21. Kh2 $1 Qh4 22. Re3 (22. Ne2 $2 Be5+ 23. Kg1 Bxh3 $1 24.  gxh3 Qxh3 25. Bc2 Qh2+ 26. Kf1 Qh3+ 27. Kf2 Qh2+ $11) 22... Bxe3 23. Bxe3 $14)  20. Qf3 Qd4+ 21. Qe3 Qf6+ $2 (21... Qe5 $16 {is better}) 22. Ke2 $18 Ba6+ (  22... Qg6) 23. Kd1 {and the white king escapes} Bc5 $6 (23... Qe5) 24. e5 (24.  Qf4 $1) 24... Qg6 (24... Qxe5 25. Qe4 Qh5+ {is a bit better}) 25. Qe4 dxe5 26.  Qxg6 fxg6 27. Bc2 $6 (27. Ne4 $18) 27... Bc4 28. Ra4 Bb4 (28... Bf1 {is better}  ) 29. Re4 Rf1+ 30. Be1 Bxc3 31. Raxc4 Ba5 32. Ra4 Rb5 33. Rxe5 $4 (33. Rxa5 $1  Rxa5 34. Ke2 $18) 33... Rxd5+ $1 34. Bd3 ({Oops.} 34. Rxd5 Rxe1#) 34... Rxe5  0-1   

  [Event "New York Open"]  [Date "2000"]  [White "John Fedorowicz"]  [Black "Dario Alzate"]  [Result "1-0"]  [ECO "E12"]  [WhiteElo "2540"]  [BlackElo "2415"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "87"]  [EventDate "2000.05.05"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "9"]  [EventCountry "USA"]  [SourceTitle "CL, Oct 2000"]  [SourceDate "2019.02.22"]  [SourceVersionDate "2019.02.22"]   1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. c4 b6 4. a3 Ba6 5. Qc2 Bb7 6. Nc3 c5 7. e4 cxd4 8. Nxd4  d6 (8... Bc5 $1 $11 {Stockfish}) 9. Be2 a6 10. g4 $5 (10. Be3) 10... h6 11. h4  {Consistent althought Stockfish again prefers} (11. Be3) 11... Be7 $2 (11...  Nbd7 12. Rg1 Nc5 13. Bf3 (13. f3 Nh7 $1 $11) 13... Rc8 14. Be3 h5 $1 $11 {  Stockfish}) 12. Rg1 Nh7 {Fedorowicz criticizes this move as passive and  suggests instead} (12... g6 {but Stockfish prefers the move played by a tenth  of a pawn and suggests that}) (12... Nfd7 {is about a tenth of a pawn better  than that}) 13. Nf3 $1 g5 $6 (13... Nf8 {is more tenacious and}) (13... Bxh4  14. Nxh4 Qxh4 15. Be3 {followed by queenside castling gives White a sizable  advantage}) 14. Be3 $6 (14. hxg5 Nxg5 (14... hxg5 15. Rh1) 15. Nd4 {is stronger  }) 14... Nd7 $2 (14... gxh4 15. O-O-O $14) 15. O-O-O $6 (15. hxg5 Nxg5 16. Nd2  Qc7 17. O-O-O $16) 15... Qc7 $2 (15... gxh4) 16. hxg5 Nxg5 (16... hxg5 17. Rh1  O-O-O 18. e5 $1 $18 ({Fedorowicz gives} 18. Rh6 {as "strong for White" but  after} Nhf6 19. Rxh8 (19. Rdh1 $2 Rxh6 20. Rxh6 Nxg4 {wins for Black}) 19...  Rxh8 {Black is still in the game})) 17. Nd2 e5 {Forced, according to  Fedorowicz, but Stockfish prefers} (17... Bf8 {Black's position is unenviable  in either case}) 18. Nd5 (18. Rh1 $1 $18) 18... Bxd5 19. exd5 Nh3 20. Rh1 Nf4  21. Bf1 (21. Bf3 $1) 21... Rc8 (21... O-O-O {is somewhat better}) 22. Kb1 b5 $2  ({Fedorowicz simply says "If} 22... Nxd5 {then} 23. Rxh6 {" but it's still  better than the text according to Stockfish which gives}) (22... Bg5 {as the  best defense}) 23. Rc1 Qb7 $138 (23... Rb8) 24. Qb3 $6 (24. Bxf4 exf4 25. g5 $1  Bxg5 26. Ne4 Be7 27. c5 {splatters Black (who is lost in any event)}) 24... Nc5  25. Bxc5 Rxc5 26. Ne4 $6 {White is determined to use the slow method} (26. Rd1  {is quicker}) 26... Rc8 $6 (26... Rc7 $16) 27. Rc3 (27. Ng3 $1) 27... Kf8 (  27... Rb8 $142) 28. Ka2 (28. Ng3 $142) 28... Kg7 (28... Rb8 $142 29. cxb5 axb5  30. Rc6 $16) 29. Ng3 Rb8 30. Nf5+ Kf8 31. cxb5 $18 Qxd5 32. Qxd5 (32. bxa6 $1 {  is a lot stronger and cuter} Rxb3 $4 33. Rc8+) 32... Nxd5 33. Rch3 $6 (33. Rc6  axb5 34. Bxb5 $18) 33... axb5 34. Rxh6 Rg8 35. Nxd6 $2 {Fedorowicz says that  "Black's position is coming apart" whereas in fact White is letting him back  into the game} (35. Rh8 $18) 35... b4 36. Bc4 (36. a4 $142) 36... bxa3 {  Fedorowicz calls this "desperation"; Stockfish calls it equal} 37. Bxd5 Rxb2+  38. Ka1 $6 (38. Kxa3 $11) 38... Rxf2 $2 (38... Rd2 $14) 39. Nf5 $18 Bc5 40. Ra6  Bd4+ 41. Kb1 Rb2+ 42. Kc1 Rb8 43. Rh7 Bb2+ 44. Kd1 1-0   

  [Event "American Open"]  [Site "Santa Monica, CA"]  [Date "1973"]  [Round "?"]  [White "Larry M. Evans"]  [Black "James Tarjan"]  [Result "0-1"]  [ECO "B77"]  [Annotator "ATH"]  [PlyCount "62"]  [EventDate "1973.11.??"]  [EventType "swiss"]  [EventRounds "8"]  [EventCountry "USA"]  [SourceTitle "CL&R?"]  [Source "ChessBase"]  [SourceDate "2002.11.12"]  [SourceVersion "1"]  [SourceVersionDate "2002.11.12"]  [SourceQuality "1"]   1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 Nc6 8. Qd2  O-O 9. Bc4 ({Alternatives are} 9. O-O-O {and}) (9. g4) 9... Bd7 10. h4 Rc8 $13  {according to Kasparov and Keene in BCO2} 11. Bb3 Ne5 12. h5 (12. g4 $1 $14 {  Stockfish}) 12... Nxh5 13. g4 Nf6 14. Bh6 (14. O-O-O {is best according to  Stockfish while ECO's main line}) (14. Nd5 {fails to} e6 $15) 14... Bxh6 15.  Qxh6 $6 ({Ekstrom-Nemet, Swiss-ch 1995 went} 15. Rxh6 Qa5 16. O-O-O Rxc3 17.  bxc3 $6 Rc8 (17... Bxg4 $1 18. fxg4 Nxe4 $17) 18. Kb2 $44 {with a draw after  34 moves}) 15... Rxc3 $1 16. bxc3 Qa5 17. O-O-O Qxc3 18. Kb1 $6 (18. Nf5 $1  gxf5 (18... Bxf5 19. exf5 $11) 19. gxf5 Qxf3 20. Rdg1+ Neg4 21. Rh4 Qf1+ $1 22.  Rxf1 Nxh6 23. Rxh6 $44) 18... Rc8 19. Qc1 $6 (19. Qd2 $15) 19... a5 20. g5 Nh5  21. a3 Qc5 22. Qb2 $6 (22. Rh2 $17) 22... Ra8 (22... b5 $1) 23. Rhf1 $2 (23.  Ka1 $17) 23... a4 $19 24. Ba2 (24. f4 Ng4 25. Bxf7+ {is a lot better according  to the computer but it hardly matters. White is lost.}) 24... Ra6 25. f4 Ng4 ({  The fact that the computer thinks} 25... Rb6 {is a lot better also hardly  matters.}) 26. f5 Ne5 27. fxg6 hxg6 28. Kc1 Rb6 29. Qa1 Bg4 30. Rde1 Nc4 31.  Bxc4 $2 {The final (irrelevant) blunder} Qxg5+ 0-1